Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 51(1): e5427, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-889002

ABSTRACT

Protocols that mimic resistance exercise training (RET) in rodents present several limitations, one of them being the electrical stimulus, which is beyond the physiological context observed in humans. Recently, our group developed a conditioning system device that does not use electric shock to stimulate rats, but includes fasting periods before each RET session. The current study was designed to test whether cumulative fasting periods have some influence on skeletal muscle mass and function. Three sets of male Wistar rats were used in the current study. The first set of rats was submitted to a RET protocol without food restriction. However, rats were not able to perform exercise properly. The second and third sets were then randomly assigned into three experimental groups: 1) untrained control rats, 2) untrained rats submitted to fasting periods, and 3) rats submitted to RET including fasting periods before each RET session. While the second set of rats performed a short RET protocol (i.e., an adaptation protocol for 3 weeks), the third set of rats performed a longer RET protocol including overload (i.e., 8 weeks). After the short-term protocol, cumulative fasting periods promoted loss of weight (P<0.001). After the longer RET protocol, no difference was observed for body mass, extensor digitorum longus (EDL) morphology or skeletal muscle function (P>0.05 for all). Despite no effects on EDL mass, soleus muscle displayed significant atrophy in the fasting experimental groups (P<0.01). Altogether, these data indicate that fasting is a major limitation for RET in rats.


Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Physical Conditioning, Animal/physiology , Fasting/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Resistance Training/methods , Reference Values , Time Factors , Body Weight/physiology , Adaptation, Physiological , Random Allocation , Eating/physiology
2.
Psiquiatr. biol ; 7(3): 111-117, set. 1999.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-298976

ABSTRACT

Um dos modelos comportamentais mais utilizados na avaliacao de drogas antipsicoticas é o da pre-exposicao ao estímulo a ser condicionado, ou inibiçäo latente(LI). Na LI, a exposiçäo prévia a um estímulo sem consequencia retarda a aprendizagem, quando esse mesmo estímulo, numa fase posterior, é pareado com um reforçador. Neste artigo é feita, preliminarmente, uma revisäo da utilizaçäo da LI como modelo animal para avaliaçäo de drogas antipsicóticas, e de seu fundamento neuroquímico. A seguir, discutem-se os processos comportamentais implicados na pré-exposiçäo, e que explicariam o desempenho na fase de condicionamento. Duas teorias principais säo examinadas, à luz dos paradigmas respondentte e operante do comportamento: 1) a de Mackintosh, que considera que a aprendizagem deirrelevancia do estímulo ocorre quando esse näo sinaliza nenhuma mudança em um reforçador específico, e 2) a de Lubow, que defende a existencia de uma hipotética resposta de atençäo que decresceria aao longo de repetidas exposiçöes ao estímulo, o que diminuiria sua futura associabilidade quando na funçäo de estímulo condicional


Subject(s)
Animals , Schizophrenia , Inhibition, Psychological
3.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 32(3): 333-9, Mar. 1999.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-230462

ABSTRACT

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (FLX) is widely prescribed for depression and anxiety-related disorders. On the other hand, enhanced serotonergic transmission is known to be classically related to anxiety. In this study, the effects of acute (5.0 mg/kg) and chronic (5.0 mg/kg, 22 days) FLX were investigated in both food-deprived and non-deprived rats tested in the elevated plus-maze. Significant main effects of the three factors (drug, food condition and administration regimen) were observed, but no interaction between them. The administration of either acute or chronic FLX resulted in an anxiogenic effect, as detected by a significant reduction in the percentage of time spent in the open arms and in the percentage of open arm entries. Food deprivation yielded an anxiolytic-like profile, probably related to changes in locomotor activity. The administration regimen resulted in an anxiolytic profile in chronically treated rats, as would be expected after 22 days of regular handling. The anxiogenic action of acute FLX is consistent with both its neurochemical and clinical profile. The discrepancy between the anxiogenic profile of chronic FLX and its therapeutic uses is discussed in terms of possible differences between the type of anxiety that is measured in the plus-maze and the types of human anxiety that are alleviated by fluoxetine


Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Fluoxetine/pharmacology , Maze Learning/drug effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Analysis of Variance , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Food Deprivation , Handling, Psychological , Rats, Wistar
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL